Mike Adams
Natural News
April 1, 2013
If you talk to the global warming crowd, carbon dioxide — CO2 — is the enemy
of mankind. Any and all creation of CO2 is bad for the planet, we’re told, and
its production must be strictly limited in order to save the world.
But what if that wasn’t true? What if CO2 were actually
a planet-saving nutrient that could multiply food production
rates and feed the world more nutritious, healthy plants?
CO2 is a vital nutrient for food crops
As it turns out, CO2 is desperately needed by food crops, and right now there
is a severe shortage of CO2 on the planet compared to what would be optimum for
plants. Greenhouse operators are actually buying carbon dioxide
and injecting it into their greenhouses in order to maximize plant growth.
The science on this is irrefutable. As just one example, the Ontario Ministry
of Agriculture and Food says:
CO2 increases productivity through improved plant growth and vigour. Some
ways in which productivity is increased by CO2 include earlier flowering, higher
fruit yields, reduced bud abortion in roses, improved stem strength and flower
size. Growers should regard CO2 as a nutrient.
If you want to understand why CO2 is an essential nutrient for food crop
growth, check out this informative slide show. It explains that “CO2 may be
repidly depleted during crop production” daylight hours, because the plants pull
all the CO2 out of the air and use it in photosynthesis.
The CO2 found in modern-day atmosphere is 340ppm. But food crops would grow
far faster if the concentration of CO2 were closer to 1000ppm, or roughly 300% higher than
current levels. In fact, most greenhouse plant production causes a “CO2
depletion” to happen, shutting down photosynthesis and limiting food production.
As the “Carbon Dioxide in Greenhouses” fact sheet explains:
Ambient CO2 level in outside air is about 340 ppm by volume. All plants
grow well at this level but as CO2 levels are raised by 1,000 ppm photosynthesis
increases proportionately resulting in more sugars and carbohydrates available
for plant growth. Any actively growing crop in a tightly clad greenhouse with
little or no ventilation can readily reduce the CO2 level during the day to as
low as 200 ppm.
Thus, greenhouse plants are “running out” of CO2. They are starving for it.
And when you add it to food crops, you get higher yields, improved taste, shorter
flowering times, enhanced pest resistance and other benefits.
Why we should pump carbon dioxide into greenhouses
This brings up an obvious answer for what to do with all the CO2 produced by
power plants, office buildings and even fitness centers where people exhale vast
quantities of CO2. The answer is to build adjacent greenhouses and pump
the CO2 into the greenhouses.
Every coal-fired power plant, in other words, should have a vast array of
greenhouses surrounding it. Most of what you see emitted from power plant
smokestacks is water vapor and CO2, both essential nutrients
for rapid growth of food crops. By diverting carbon
dioxide and water into greenhouses, the problem of emissions is instantly
solved because the plants update the CO2 and use it for
photosynthesis, thus “sequestering” the CO2 while rapidly growing food
crops. It also happens to produce oxygen as a “waste product” which can be
released into the atmosphere, (slightly) upping the oxygen level of the air we
breathe.
This is a brilliant solution because humans want to live on a world with low
CO2 that supports frozen ice caps in order to keep ocean water levels low, but
they want to eat a volume of food that requires high CO2 for production. The
answer is to concentrate CO2 into greenhouses where food
production is multiplied by CO2 nutrition.
I’ll bet you’ve never heard Al Gore talk about CO2 as “nutrition.” He
declares it a pollutant and wants to tax you for producing it. But CO2 is
actually a key nutritive gas for food crops. Without carbon dioxide, we
would all have starved to death by now.
Shutting down power plants to destroy America’s power
infrastructure
The U.S. government’s solution to power plant emissions, however, is to
just shut down coal-fired power plants, causing rolling
blackouts across the USA, especially during hot summer days. The EPA has
forced hundreds of power plants to shut down across the USA,
achieving a loss of power infrastructure that vastly exceeds what would even be
possible by an enemy invasion of high-altitude warplanes dropping bombs.
The EPA, under the excuse of “saving the planet,” is destroying America’s
power infrastructure and leading our nation into a third-world scenario where
power availability is dicey and unsustained. It seems to be just one part of the
overall plan to gut America’s economy, offshore millions of jobs, put everybody
on welfare and destroy small businesses.
But what if we harnessed coal-fired power plants instead of
shutting them down? What if we used them as “CO2 generators” that fed CO2 into
vast greenhouse operations that produced organic, high-growth foods that could
feed the nation? Coal-fired power plants can produce both electricity and food
nutrition at the same time.
Better yet, if you combine this concept with aquaponics, you
get simultaneous production of plants and fish while using no soil, no GMOs and
one-tenth the water of conventional agriculture.
See, the solutions to all our problems already exist. The only reason we are
suffering as a nation is because political puppets try to brainwash us into
believing complete falsehoods like, “carbon dioxide
is a dangerous pollutant” or “the people don’t need healthy foods; they need
medications and vaccines.” When societies believe falsehoods, they crumble and
collapse.
That’s where America is headed, of course. And it’s all being accelerated by
deceptive bureaucrats who want to convince you that growing real food is bad and
we should all be punished for exhaling carbon dioxide, an essential nutrient for
food crops. Carbon dioxide is not the enemy it’s been made out to be. It’s
actually plant nutrition that helps regrow rainforests, food
crops and wetlands. In fact, higher CO2 levels in the atmosphere would make the
planet more lush and abundant in terms of plant life, forests,
trees and food crops.
Monday, April 1, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment