Hospitals on the Italian island of Sardinia are being ordered to kick out local patients in order to make way for migrants.
Il Giornale reports that a scandal is brewing after government officials told hospitals to discharge their existing patients so that hundreds of “refugees” arriving in Porto Torres could be sent for health check ups.
The advisory tells staff that they need to send patients home in the morning if possible and in the afternoon by the latest, and that doctors and nurses should prepare themselves for “a load of very heavy work”.
According to the report, “approximately 198 men, 126 women and 68 children” arrived at Porto Torres in one night alone.
Another report described the order as “a communication between madness and total ruthlessness”.
In 2014 and 2015, a staggering 320,000 migrants arrived on Italian shores. Boats are often sent to just off the coast of Libya to rescue huge numbers of “refugees”.
This is by no means the first instance of native Italians being moved aside to make way for migrants.
Last month, we reported on an 80-year-old hotel owner who was forced by police to house numerous migrants in his small guest house.
While Democrats, sore losers and the butthurt corporate media continue to yell ‘THE RUSSIANS DID IT’ or something… a sane voice noted that it is far more likely that it was in fact people within the US intelligence community who leaked the DNC emails to Wikileaks, which ultimately wound up affecting the election result, so the left would have America believe.
Appearing on Varney and Co., Judge Andrew Napolitano told Stewart Varney that he has a source inside the intelligence community who is adamant that insiders leaked the damning emails to Wikileaks, and the Vladimir Putin and Russia had nothing to do with it.
“There is NO EVIDENCE that this was done by the Russians.” Napolitano stated, adding “But there is evidence for this. Who was harmed by Mrs. Clinton’s extremely careless use of state secrets? Whose agents’ lives were jeopardized by her failure to keep these state secrets? The American intelligence community.”
“It is more likely than not that members of the American intelligence community leaked this to Julian Assange than that the Russians did… The suggestion comes from members of the intelligence community.” Napolitano noted.
Napolitano has made the same claims before, stating that members of the intelligence community simply did not want Hillary Clinton to be President of the United States.As Infowars reported in November, days before the election, numerous trustworthy sources have claimed that the Podesta hack, which led to Wikileaks releasing tens of thousands of Clinton campaign emails, as well as other hacks targeting the Democratic Party, were the work of U.S. intelligence operatives attempting to save America from a Clinton presidency.William Binney, NSA whistleblower and former technical head of the NSA, also told Infowars back in August that the email leaks were carried out by individuals within the US intelligence community who were angry at Hillary exposing classified information and sought to take revenge.The CIA and FBI examined the exact same data that was produced for them by the NSA.” Napolitano said.“The CIA analysts said the Russians are behind this. The FBI analysts said there is no evidence that the Russians are behind this. We do know this was leaking. This was not hacking. Leaking is the unauthorized exposure of something to a person to whom it wasn’t intended. Hacking is the altering of an operational system… You can’t affect the outcome of the election if you hack Clinton and the DNC. You can affect the outcome of an election if you affect those who register the voters or count the voters.”Napolitano’s analysis also dovetails with that of former British ambassador Craig Murray, who was told by security insiders that the email leak “comes from within official circles in Washington DC.”
"I'm not a victim. I can vote, I can participate, I can invest my money, I can invest my time, and that's what I'm doing."
Kelen McBreen | Infowars.com - December 14, 2016
In an interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper, Hall of Fame running back Jim Brown discussed his meeting with Donald Trump.
Cooper started off trying to bait Brown into a conversation about race by asking his opinion on Trump’s comments regarding problems in African American communities.
Brown avoided discussing race, instead replying with…
For years the Presidency has been like a smooth ride and nothing dramatic has happened, but with him every day is full of energy, things are going to happen.
Next, Anderson mentioned that Brown supported Clinton early on and how many Democrats were upset about the election results, even depressed.
The CNN host then asked why Brown was still open to working with Trump rather than being upset.
Brown responded by saying that in his opinion, “Those who go against the election are going against America” and explained how, “If we respect the winner and approach or have access to that person, then he can look at what we’re presenting, and that’s not too bad.”
I could have sat on my butt and complained when Hillary lost, but you see one thing about this country is if you get off your butt and apply yourself, you can be successful.
Cooper went on to ask Brown if the predominantly white male cabinet chosen by Trump was a concern to him.
A lot of black people in my community might think I’m a sellout for saying this. The three greatest people in my life were white…and so I’m not a person that really deals in color. I recognize certain equities that certain cultures have to go through, I understand the history of slavery, I know all of those things, but I’m not a victim. I can vote, I can participate, I can invest my money, I can invest my time and that’s what I’m doing. I’m not working for anybody or making any money making what I’m doing, I’m doing it because someone did it for me.
In a similar segment with CNN Brown was again asked if Trump’s cabinet choices were troubling to him.
He replied in similar fashion, shutting down the network’s attempt at race-baiting by stating, “I have lived all my life in America and I’m eighty years old, so I’ve seen discrimination at its worst… I never really had a father, but it was in this country where I got help from people who were not of my same color. When I come out of the box, I don’t come out racial, I look for good people who are like-minded and want to do good for other human beings.”
When the WaPo posted last Friday’s story about a “secret” CIA assessment that Russian cyber attacks were aimed at helping Republican President-elect Donald Trump win the 2016 election, the readers of the Bezos-owned publication took it as gospel, despite, as we promptly noted, there being no evidence provided by the CIA, and as we learned today, the FBI openly resisting the CIA’s assessment. It now appears that once again the WaPo may have been engaging in “partial fake news”, as it did with its Nov. 24 story about “Russian propaganda fake media.”
According to Reuters, the so-called overseers of the U.S. intelligence community as it supervises the 17 agency-strong U.S. intelligence community, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), while not disputing the CIA’s analysis of Russian hacking operations – something which would be unprecedented for the US spy industry and would telegraph just how partisan and broken the country’s intelligence apparatus has become – has refused to endorse the CIA’s assessment “because of a lack of conclusive evidence” that Moscow intended to boost Trump over Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton.
As Reuters conveniently notes, the ODNI position could give Trump fresh ammunition to dispute the CIA assessment, which he rejected as “ridiculous” in weekend remarks, and press his assertion that no evidence implicates Russia in the cyber attacks. The ODNI’s position confirms that Trump was once again, you guessed it, right. “ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can’t prove intent,” said one of the three U.S. officials.As reported earlier, the FBI, whose evidentiary standards require it to make cases that can stand up in court, likewise declined to accept the CIA’s analysis – a deductive assessment of the available intelligence – for the same reason, the three officials said.The ODNI, headed by James Clapper, was established after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the recommendation of the commission that investigated the attacks. The commission, which identified major intelligence failures, recommended the office’s creation to improve coordination among U.S. intelligence agencies.As a reminder, the first hint that the US would scapegoat Russia for an “unexpected election outcome” took place on October 7, when the U.S. government formally accused Russia of a campaign of cyber attacks against American political organizations ahead of the Nov. 8 presidential election. Back then, president Barack Obama has said he warned Russian President Vladimir Putin about consequences for the attacks. Reports of the assessment by the CIA, which has not publicly disclosed its findings, have prompted congressional leaders to call for an investigation.The narrative escalated rapidly last week, when outgoing president Obama ordered intelligence agencies to review the cyber attacks and foreign intervention in the presidential election and to deliver a report before he turns power over to Trump on Jan. 20.So how did the CIA come to its conclusion?According to Reuters, the agency assessed after the election that the attacks on political organizations were aimed at swaying the vote for Trump because the targeting of Republican organizations diminished toward the end of the summer and focused on Democratic groups, a senior U.S. official told Reuters on Friday. Moreover, only materials filched from Democratic groups – such as emails stolen from John Podesta, the Clinton campaign chairman – were made public via WikiLeaks, the anti-secrecy organization, and other outlets, U.S. officials said.The CIA conclusion – one of induction and no supporting evidence – was a “judgment based on the fact that Russian entities hacked both Democrats and Republicans and only the Democratic information was leaked,” one of the three officials said on Monday. “(It was) a thin reed upon which to base an analytical judgment,” the official added.Earlier Monday, Senator John McCain said on Monday also confronted the CIA’s assessment, saying there was “no information” that Russian hacking of American political organizations was aimed at swaying the outcome of the election. “It’s obvious that the Russians hacked into our campaigns,” McCain said. “But there is no information that they were intending to affect the outcome of our election and that’s why we need a congressional investigation,” he told Reuters.McCain also questioned an assertion made on Sunday by RNC Chair Reince Priebus, who said that there were no hacks of computers belonging to Republican organizations. “Actually, because Mr. Priebus said that doesn’t mean it’s true,” said McCain. “We need a thorough investigation of it, whether both (Democratic and Republican organizations) were hacked into, what the Russian intentions were. We cannot draw a conclusion yet. That’s why we need a thorough investigation.”Well, just because HIllary said that, it did make it true, so perhaps Reince is right as well?Meanwhile, in an angry letter sent to ODNI chief Clapper on Monday, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes said he was “dismayed” that the top U.S. intelligence official had not informed the panel of the CIA’s analysis and the difference between its judgment and the FBI’s assessment. Noting that Clapper in November testified that intelligence agencies lacked strong evidence linking Russian cyber attacks to the WikiLeaks disclosures, Nunes asked that Clapper, together with CIA and FBI counterparts, brief the panel by Friday on the latest intelligence assessment of Russian hacking during the election campaign.We, for one, can’t wait to hear his testimony – under oath – why in the span of one month so much has changed, and who precisely prompted the CIA to “infer” that Russia is responsible for Hillary Clinton’s loss. Or maybe we will just have to wait for Wikileaks, pardon Russia, to hack Podesta’s email account for that first?
Desperate media attacks continue to fail as 1776 goes worldwide
Infowars.com - December 12, 2016
The establishment media, seemingly unaware of its plummeting popularity and waning influence, continues to attack Alex Jones and President-elect Donald Trump.
The comment section in a Washington Times hit piece last week, entitled, “Infowars’ Alex Jones appeals to Trump for aid over fears of ‘fake news’ crackdown,” perfectly exemplifies the public’s disdain for the dishonest press.
“The mainstream media’s clear intention with this ‘fake news’ campaign is to shut down infowars. It’s undeniable!,” one of the most popular comments said.
“No one listens to the Washington times,” another said. “The people know who really spreads the fake news: you. Pathetic.”
The so-called “mainstream media,” which itself is notorious for spreading fake news, is now attempting to shut down all opposing views in the wake up their devastating election failure.
Whether the lies of WMDs, which resulted in the death of hundreds of thousands, or “hands up don’t shoot,” the establishment press is the ultimate purveyor of fake news.
President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team questioned the credibility of the CIA late Friday in response to a report the agency found Russia intervened in the election to boost his prospects.
“These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction,” the Trump transition team said in a statement. “The election ended a long time ago in one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history. It’s now time to move on and ‘Make America Great Again.'”
The statement came in response to a report in The Washington Post that the CIA concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election on behalf of Trump.
“Intelligence agencies have identified individuals with connections to the Russian government who provided WikiLeaks with thousands of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and others, including Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, according to U.S. officials,” the Post reported, based on unnamed sources who were “briefed on the matter.”
It is now alarmingly evident that there truly is a war on for your mind.
Alex Jones | Infowars.com - December 10, 2016
Alex Jones breaks down the total absurdity of the king and queen of fake news, Brian Williams and Hillary Clinton, declaring an all out attack on what they deem to be fake news.
Despite Williams losing his job with NBC’s Nightly News last year for spreading fake news and Clinton being caught lying about an attack on a Bosnia trip – not to mention voting for a war that killed thousands that was based on fake news – they continue to push forward in their attempt to shut down the alternative press that is rapidly growing and pushing out the faltering mainstream media.
As the EU demands censorship of fake news, Reddit, Facebook and others have begun blocking Infowars and other alternative media.
It is now alarmingly evident that there truly is a war on for your mind.
Alex Jones breaks down how President-elect Donald Trump is fulfilling his campaign promise to take on unelected global government and to finally put Americanism over globalism.
Watch highlights from Trump’s historic Victory Tour rally speech in Ohio this week:
Calls for a recount and the erroneous assertion that Hillary won the popular vote are fueling the latest sneak effort by the globalists to rip the control out of the hands of the rightful heirs: The American Patriots.
Meanwhile, terror sleeper cells are waiting to be activated across the Republic.
Bev Harris, the country’s leading vote fraud expert, joined the Alex Jones Show Monday to reveal the results of a bombshell investigation into “vote shaving” software.
Used in precincts all across the country, the software – deemed “the most devastating election theft mechanism yet found” – allows votes to be fractured and rounded up or down to sway the results for any candidate.
According to Harris, a member of the non-partisan Black Box Voting investigative team, this latest discovery constitutes the “missing piece” that blows the lid off of wide-scale voter fraud.
“It was put in the system in 2001 but it came into wide use in 2006,” Harris said. “It took someone with a special set of skills to know what to look for.”
A mini-documentary by Black Box Voting on the discovery shows real-time demonstrations with the secretive software.
“It can give contract signing authority to whoever the user chooses,” the video’s description states. “All political power can be converted to the hands of a few anonymous subcontractors.”
“It runs silently, invisibly, and can produce plausible results that really pass for the real thing.”
Clinton scrambles following FBI announcement on new email evidence
Infowars.com - October 28, 2016
Alex Jones breaks down the FBI’s Friday announcement on the reopening of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server as new evidence surfaces.
The new data was reportedly uncovered during a separate investigation into Anthony Weiner – the husband of Clinton ally Huma Abedin.
FBI Director James Comey cited “recent developments” for the bureau’s decision in a letter to committees and lawmakers today.
“In previous congressional testimony, I referred to the fact that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had completed its investigation of former Secretary Clinton’s personal email server. Due to recent developments, I am writing to supplement my previous testimony,” Comey wrote.
“In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation. I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.”
These new revelations could undoubtedly spell trouble for Clinton as Trump has vowed to fully investigate her actions upon winning the election.
Sweden has legalized the ISIS flag and is now offering returning jihadists welfare and housing.
Will it become the first European country in the 21st century to be declared an Islamic Caliphate?
I talk to ‘The Angry Foreigner’ – a Bosnian immigrant living in Sweden – about how mass Muslim immigration has changed the country. Share this video! https://youtu.be/Ylg9NPFzPnA SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
A former aide to Hillary Clinton has seen her up close and personal. She’s been there for the big deliberations and decisions.
So perhaps Neera Tanden should be asked why she told Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta that Hillary’s instincts can be “terrible.”
Tanden exchanged emails in September 2015 and released today in which the two aired concerns about Hillary’s campaign.
Podesta wrote: We are still way more likely than not to win nomination. We’ve taken on a lot of water that won’t be easy to pump out of the boat. Most of that has to do with terrible decisions made pre-campaign, but a lot has to do with her instincts. She’s nervous so prepping more and performing better. Got to do something to pump up excitement but not certain how to do that.
Tanden wrote back on the same day, “You know I’m not a sycophant to you by any means. But the thing that makes me most confident she will prevail is that you are there.
“Almost no one knows better me that her instincts can be terrible.”
Here’s the original email, courtesy of Wikileaks.
What do you say CNN, MSNBC and Fox News?
Voters deserve to know why one of Hillary’s former aides thinks her instincts can be “terrible.”
Citizen journalism and social media has overpowered the collapsing, discredited mainstream media, says Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe.
“You are seeing social media and the grassroots in this country become more powerful than the mainstream media,” O’Keefe said on The Alex Jones Show Thursday. “We’re the social media barbarians at the gates.”
Because the bombshell Project Veritas videos are receiving enormous online attention, the mainstream media is now forced to do their job and cover it after Republican nominee Donald Trump brought them up at the final presidential debate and people “flooded their inboxes.”
“If they air this stuff, the election’s over,” O’Keefe added.
He explained how the first undercover video reveals a “dark money” conspiracy to induce violence at Trump rallies, showing Democratic operative Bob Creamer – who’s resigned since the video’s release – taking credit for the violence and explaining how their orders came from a chain of command connected to the White House.
“Nobody wanted to cover it, Alex. It got six million views on YouTube, that video,” O’Keefe said. “This guy Bob Creamer is no joke. He’s a community organizer, he’s met with the President 47 times.”
“He’s been to the White House 340 times. He’s the heart of the institutional Left.”The second explosive videos shows Democratic operative Scott Foval talking about how they’ve been using dirty tricks and shady strategies to fix elections for the last fifty years.“The guy in the video says ‘We don’t care about the law. We want to win this mother******’,” said O’Keefe. “You can’t make this stuff up. And social media has forced the mainstream media to cover this.”“It’s become a global video phenomenon.”With trust in mainstream media hitting new lows since they’ve abandoned their journalistic integrity to destroy Trump, the media can expect their ratings to continue plummeting as Wikileaks continues to show media collusion with the Clinton campaign.
An inside look at what is really going on in Haiti
Infowars.com - October 17, 2016
Infowars reporters Joe Biggs and Michael Zimmermann went into Haiti to show what’s really going on and how the Clinton Foundation is nowhere to be found.
Hillary Clinton angrily referred to a black servant as the n-word, according to a bombshell claim by Tracey Martin, a former traveling chef who worked under the first Clinton administration.
Martin’s LinkedIn page features a photograph of him shaking hands with Hillary Clinton and includes details of how he has cooked for “numerous heads of state,” including Margaret Thatcher, Helmut Kohl and President and Mrs. George H. W. Bush.
Martin claims the incident occurred during a private function at the Elizabeth Taylor Medical Center in Washington DC prior to a public engagement between Hillary Clinton and Bernadette Chirac, the wife of the former French President Jacques Chirac.
“A gentleman of color came in with something and it did not please her the way it was and when he walked out she says ‘that’ and then she used the n-word,” Martin told WBEN 930 radio host Tom Bauerle.
“So you are alone with Hillary after the black guys brings something that Hillary doesn’t like and she said to you ‘that n-word'” Bauerle asked Martin.
“Yes,” Martin confirmed.
According to Martin, the Clintons made racist comments on a routine basis and the incident didn’t come as a great shock to him.
“They think nothing of it, because there’s no press around….after you’ve been around them long enough, whether it be the Clintons or the Kennedys or whoever, once they feel comfortable with you, their guard is let down,” said Martin.
Within 48 hours of doing the interview, Martin claimed that his phone was hacked and that his apartment was broken into at 3am.
Host Tom Bauerle also said that after the interview, his loved one received an odd voicemail message from a phone number that was later revealed from the Wikileaks dump to have come from within the DNC.
The notion that Hillary Clinton is a closet racist isn’t much of a stretch.
After all, she called black people super predators and once praised Robert Byrd as her “mentor”. Byrd was the founding member and leader of a chapter of the Ku Klux Klan.
Her husband Bill Clinton also once expressed his anger that Ted Kennedy was endorsing Barack Obama in favor of Hillary by belittling Obama because he was black.
“A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee,” Clinton told Kennedy.
While Martin’s claim is merely an accusation – there is no audio or video evidence to back it up – the mainstream media has afforded blanket coverage to similar accusations against Donald Trump.
There is no audio or video evidence to verify the accusations made against Trump by numerous women who claim they were sexually assaulted by him, but the media has given those women a platform anyway,
Will the media dare touch this story? Will they dare to give Tracey Martin a platform to re-iterate his accusation that Hillary Clinton angrily called a black servant the ‘n-word’?
Hillary has no support, so she's going to try and steal the election!
Infowars.com - October 15, 2016
Alex uncovers the possibility that the globalists will use Russia as a scapegoat to throw the US into chaos, allowing Hillary to steal the election.
Hillary answers to foreign, multinational groups who want to permanently wound America and merge it into their global power structure which only they control.
To accomplish this, the globalists will likely try to steal the election for Hillary and start a military conflict with Russia. Both strategies are complimentary.
Notice how the U.S. is now staging a cyber attack against Russia, despite the fact that Russia doesn’t have anywhere near the cyberwarfare capability of the U.S. government.
This is intended to create a public narrative that Russia poses a major cyber threat that will give the globalists an opportunity to blame Russia for “hacking the election” and respond with warfare.
There is one thing that could unravel their plan: patriots within the government who are aware of what’s going on and don’t want a nuclear war with Russia.
Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta used a term known to reference assassination in an email sent to a lobbyist days before Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s mysterious death.
The email, an exchange between Podesta and D.C. lobbyist Steve Elmendorf, appeared in a trove of documents dumped by the organization WikiLeaks Wednesday.
“Didn’t think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard,” Podesta says in the February 9 email under the subject line “Thanks”.
“I’m all in,” gay lobbyist and Hillary delegate Steve Elmendorf replies. “Sounds like it will be a bad nite, we all need to buckle up and double down.”
Justice Scalia was later found dead in a hotel room in Texas on the night of February 12 – three days after the email exchange took place.
The mysterious death was seen as suspicious by many, including a former US Army intelligence officer who deemed the pillow found over Scalia’s head to be a warning.
Emails sent throughout the Clinton campaign on the day Scalia’s death was announced show the team debated on whether or not to address the issue, and what should be said if anything.
Former U.S. Senate staffer Brent Budowsky also emailed Podesta on the 13th, the day Scalia’s body was found, suggesting a replacement for the late judge.
The term “wet work” typically refers to murder or assassination.
Alternatively, the email could also reference being “murdered” at the polls. The message’s date, February 9, coincides with the night of the New Hampshire primary, where Hillary lost to Bernie Sanders 60.4% to 38%.
Without additional context, it’s almost impossible to tell what use of the term “wet works” in the email refers to.
Infowars has reached out to John Podesta for comment. We’ll update this article if he responds.
Even if the email has nothing to do with Scalia, the Clinton campaign chairman’s use of the term will undoubtedly fuel speculation.
The Clinton campaign worried about Hillary’s lack of “emotional connection” to everyday Americans.
Democratic strategist Steve Hildebrand told Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta that Hillary must “find an emotional connection to regular Americans” in an email released by Wikileaks.
“Hillary has got to get away from Washington speak and begin immediately to find an emotional connection to regular Americans,” Hildebrand lamented. “She needs to have a greater understanding of what people and families are going through every day. And, then she needs to find an emotional connection.”
“This has to turn around now, Her speechwriters, ad writers, communication staff – she and President Clinton – all need to cut Washington rhetoric from their vocabularies and all scripts.”Podesta generally agreed with Hildebrand, stating he wanted to get the campaign “aiming in the same direction.”Hildebrand also pointed out that the Clintons “often use language that is for Washington insiders and not for the rest of us out here in America.”In other words, Hillary is too much of an establishment insider to relate to regular people outside the DC beltway, and it was turning into a problem for the campaign.Her lack of empathy for everyday Americans would explain why she called half of Donald Trump’s supporters – tens of millions of people – “deplorables.”“To just be grossly generalistic, you can put half of Trump supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables,” Clinton said in Sept. “Right? Racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic, you name it.”She even said some of these people were “irredeemable.”Trump pounced back in response.“Isn’t it disgraceful that Hillary Clinton makes the worst mistake of the political season and instead of owning up to this grotesque attack on American voters, she tries to turn it around with a pathetic rehash of the words and insults used in her failing campaign?” he replied. “For the first time in a long while, her true feelings came out, showing bigotry and hatred for millions of Americans.”
In this NEW, riveting testimonial, Bill Clinton’s long-lost son Danney Williams reveals how the Clintons cast him away and his current struggles to reconnect with his father:
Russia has begun moving nuclear-capable missiles into Europe after threatening to shoot down American planes over Syria, greatly raising the risk of all-out war with the United States.
Russian military appears to be moving nuclear-capable Iskander-M missiles from Saint Petersburg to Kaliningrad, a Russian enclave situated between NATO members Lithuania and Poland, according to sources inside Estonia.
The Iskander-M, which can fire a nuclear-armed missile over 300 miles away, is reportedly being transferred to Kaliningrad by ship approximately two years ahead of its previously scheduled deployment to the enclave.
In addition to its military deployments in Kaliningrad, Russia has deployed the S-300 and S-400 anti-aircraft missile systems to Syria after the Obama administration indicated covert air strikes on Syrian government forces are being considered to stop their advances in Aleppo.“The options under consideration, which remain classified, include bombing Syrian air force runways using cruise missiles and other long-range weapons fired from coalition planes and ships,” an administration official told the Washington Post.Russian Defense Ministry spokesperson General Igor Konashenkov said “any missile or air strikes on the territory controlled by the Syrian government will create a clear threat to Russian servicemen.”“And all the illusions of amateurs about the existence of ‘invisible’ jets will face a disappointing reality,” he added, referring to claims by the United States that Russian air defense systems are incapable of targeting American stealth aircraft.In another sign of increasing tensions, the Russian embassy in Washington posted a photo of White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest and a S-300 missile system on Twitter with a caption noting Russia will use “every defensive measure necessary” to defend its military personnel in Syria.Russia’s military buildup comes after Army Chief of Staff General Mark Milley issued a thinly veiled warning that the United States was prepared to “destroy” its enemies.“I want to be clear to those who wish to do us harm….the United States military – despite all of our challenges, despite our [operational] tempo, despite everything we have been doing – we will stop you and we will beat you harder than you have ever been beaten before. Make no mistake about that,” Milley said.Milley suggested the next major conflict would be “highly lethal, unlike anything our Army has experienced at least since World War II.”
With the polls almost at a dead heat, Hillary will contrive and exploit a shocking October surprise in a desperate effort to sink Trump.
This dirty trick could involve one of two scenarios – maybe even both.
Hillary could lean on her allies in the White House to provocateur a major military escalation with Russia, maybe even staging the shoot down of a Russian or American jet.
However, the more likely scenario is that a violent racist attack will be blamed on a MAGA hat-wearing, “white supremacist” Trump supporter.
Mohamed Dame is on the run in Sweden, after having been threatened by criminal gangs in Gothenburg. Now he’s considering fleeing back to his more peaceful homeland.
“We are at war, there are weapons and drugs everywhere.”
It’s like a war zone, he says about the Swedish suburbs, to the Norwegian broadcaster NRK.
NRK has in several reports described how the Swedish society has completely lost control of the country’s so-called exclusion areas, or no-go zones, which are instead taken over by criminal immigrants in gangs. Among others, NRK interviewed Mohamed Dame, who immigrated to Sweden from the Somali State of Hargeisa in Somaliland when he was six. 20 years later, he is “on the run again,” but this time in Sweden, writes the Norwegian state broadcaster. It’s like a war zone. You never know who might get shot. Shootings can appear anywhere. Now there are more weapons than ever. There is more drugs than ever. There is more insecurity. Everyone is afraid. I dare to speak the truth, there are not many who dare do so, says Dame. He worked as a civilian employee of the police, and a group of criminals accused him of having turned them in. After being threatened with murder and surrounded by armed youths, he is now at a secret location with his children. The situation escalates further because the police refuse to go hard and use force on the criminals, according to Mohamed. Many others have been forced to flee the suburbs but there are a few who dare to speak out, he says. Many have fled with their children. They are afraid that their children or themselves will be killed.Unless society regains control of Sweden, Mohamed considers to flee back to his homeland of Somaliland, which he currently perceives as safer. I might move back. I do not know. But I do not want to move around in Sweden. I want to feel secure.
The establishment is already in full cover-up mode.
The left is more outraged about Trump calling the NYC bombing a “bombing” than the actual bombing. Please share this video! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tm9XMrio98
Find out how Americans can benefit from an off-the-grid lifestyle
Infowars.com - September 15, 2016
Top 10 UFC Middleweight fighter and former Special Forces sniper Tim Kennedy breaks down the secret behind getting off the grid, living a self sustainable lifestyle and eating real nutritional food.
“She put the country, and I mean the entire country, at risk..."
Joe Biggs | Infowars.com - September 10, 2016
GOP nominee Donald Trump hammered Hillary Clinton in another stern speech, saying that his rival is operating a “criminal enterprise” and has “unleashed ISIS” on the world.
“She put the country, and I mean the entire country, at risk to cover up her pay-for-play scandals as secretary of State,” Trump said. “These include scandals of giving uranium to Russia, doing favors for UBS bank, and selling contracts to friends and family in Haiti. It’s all about hiding criminal enterprise.”
Also learn how young American students are using Trump’s speeches and policies to garner support on college campuses across the country.
Donald Trump warned that he would order the Navy to open fire on Iranian boats that provoke American ships, days after a high-seas incident that ended peacefully.
When the GOP presidential nominee laid out his plan to modernize the military during a Friday night rally in Pensacola, Fla., he took an off-script aside to address his posture toward Iran.
“With Iran, when they circle our beautiful destroyers with their little boats and they make gestures at our people that they shouldn’t be allowed to make, they will be shot out of the water,” Trump said to loud cheers.
Rally-goers could be heard shouting “shoot them” as Trump wound up.
This week, the Pentagon said seven Iranian attack boats harassed an American destroyer in the Persian Gulf.
Liberals are blasting the mainstream media’s supposed harsh treatment of Hillary Clinton compared to Donald Trump, assailing the coverage given to her numerous scandals and failing health.
Paul Krugman, writing for the New York Times, suggested Trump is “being graded on a curve” by the mainstream media, while everything Hillary does is perceived to be corrupt, “most spectacularly illustrated by the increasingly bizarre coverage of the Clinton Foundation.”
Responding directly to a report released by the Associated Press that called into question Hillary’s meetings with Foundation donors while Secretary of State, Krugman said “given the tone of the report, you might have expected to read about meetings with, say, brutal foreign dictators or corporate fat cats facing indictment, followed by questionable actions on their behalf… there was nothing there.”
Terms like “creates shadows” or “raises questions” are, according to Krugman, “weasel words used to create the impression of wrongdoing out of thin air.”Krugman followed up his article with a message on Twitter, saying “True fact: I was reluctant to write today’s column because I knew journalists would hate it. But it felt like a moral duty.”Billionaire Mark Cuban also took to Twitter to attack the mainstream media’s supposed Pro-Trump bias.“I’ll say it again. The MSM has gone all in on Trump,” he said.Dan Gainor, vice president for business and culture at the Media Research Center, called Cuban’s tweet the “most delusional thing I’ve seen on Twitter in years.”The notion that the mainstream media has treated Hillary more harshly than Trump is absurd.Despite Clinton’s pronounced coughing fit during a recent “press conference” aboard her campaign jet, held in response to growing criticism for not holding an official press conference in 276 days, the mainstream media has dismissed concerns surrounding her health as “conspiracy theories.”The same mainstream media, most prominently MSNBC hosts Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough, regularly suggest that Trump is mentally unfit to serve as president.
