Breaking: Drudge Report Under Unprecedented Attack. Republic in Crisis

NEW! SHTF - more evidence of ECONOMIC COLLAPSE

NEW! SHTF - the problem with... ENTITLEMENT ZOMBIES

NEW! SHTF Alert - DefCon2 - MUST WATCH

Sickening: Proud Islamic Mother Releases Video of Young Daughters Who Died In Suicide Bombing

Awesome!! Judge Jeanine Sets Michelle Obama Straight On 'Hope'!!

Hospitals in Italy Ordered to Kick Out Patients to Make Way For Migrants

Hospitals on the Italian island of Sardinia are being ordered to kick out local patients in order to make way for migrants.

Il Giornale reports that a scandal is brewing after government officials told hospitals to discharge their existing patients so that hundreds of “refugees” arriving in Porto Torres could be sent for health check ups.

The advisory tells staff that they need to send patients home in the morning if possible and in the afternoon by the latest, and that doctors and nurses should prepare themselves for “a load of very heavy work”.

According to the report, “approximately 198 men, 126 women and 68 children” arrived at Porto Torres in one night alone.
 

 

Another report described the order as “a communication between madness and total ruthlessness”.

In 2014 and 2015, a staggering 320,000 migrants arrived on Italian shores. Boats are often sent to just off the coast of Libya to rescue huge numbers of “refugees”.

This is by no means the first instance of native Italians being moved aside to make way for migrants.

Last month, we reported on an 80-year-old hotel owner who was forced by police to house numerous migrants in his small guest house.

Judge: US Intelligence Likely Leaked DNC Emails, Not Russians

Disgruntled intel workers were angry that Hillary exposed classified information

Steve Watson | Infowars.com - December 14, 2016

 

Image Credits: Brian Klug | Flickr.
 

While Democrats, sore losers and the butthurt corporate media continue to yell ‘THE RUSSIANS DID IT’ or something… a sane voice noted that it is far more likely that it was in fact people within the US intelligence community who leaked the DNC emails to Wikileaks, which ultimately wound up affecting the election result, so the left would have America believe.
Appearing on Varney and Co., Judge Andrew Napolitano told Stewart Varney that he has a source inside the intelligence community who is adamant that insiders leaked the damning emails to Wikileaks, and the Vladimir Putin and Russia had nothing to do with it.


“There is NO EVIDENCE that this was done by the Russians.” Napolitano stated, adding “But there is evidence for this. Who was harmed by Mrs. Clinton’s extremely careless use of state secrets? Whose agents’ lives were jeopardized by her failure to keep these state secrets? The American intelligence community.”
“It is more likely than not that members of the American intelligence community leaked this to Julian Assange than that the Russians did… The suggestion comes from members of the intelligence community.” Napolitano noted.
Napolitano has made the same claims before, stating that members of the intelligence community simply did not want Hillary Clinton to be President of the United States.As Infowars reported in November, days before the election, numerous trustworthy sources have claimed that the Podesta hack, which led to Wikileaks releasing tens of thousands of Clinton campaign emails, as well as other hacks targeting the Democratic Party, were the work of U.S. intelligence operatives attempting to save America from a Clinton presidency.William Binney, NSA whistleblower and former technical head of the NSA, also told Infowars back in August that the email leaks were carried out by individuals within the US intelligence community who were angry at Hillary exposing classified information and sought to take revenge.

The CIA and FBI examined the exact same data that was produced for them by the NSA.” Napolitano said.“The CIA analysts said the Russians are behind this. The FBI analysts said there is no evidence that the Russians are behind this. We do know this was leaking. This was not hacking. Leaking is the unauthorized exposure of something to a person to whom it wasn’t intended. Hacking is the altering of an operational system… You can’t affect the outcome of the election if you hack Clinton and the DNC. You can affect the outcome of an election if you affect those who register the voters or count the voters.”Napolitano’s analysis also dovetails with that of former British ambassador Craig Murray, who was told by security insiders that the email leak “comes from within official circles in Washington DC.”

 

Hall Of Famer Jim Brown Rejects Media Race-Baiting

"I'm not a victim. I can vote, I can participate, I can invest my money, I can invest my time, and that's what I'm doing."

Kelen McBreen | Infowars.com - December 14, 2016

 

 

In an interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper, Hall of Fame running back Jim Brown discussed his meeting with Donald Trump.

Cooper started off trying to bait Brown into a conversation about race by asking his opinion on Trump’s comments regarding problems in African American communities.
Brown avoided discussing race, instead replying with…

For years the Presidency has been like a smooth ride and nothing dramatic has happened, but with him every day is full of energy, things are going to happen.

Next, Anderson mentioned that Brown supported Clinton early on and how many Democrats were upset about the election results, even depressed.
The CNN host then asked why Brown was still open to working with Trump rather than being upset.
Brown responded by saying that in his opinion, “Those who go against the election are going against America” and explained how, “If we respect the winner and approach or have access to that person, then he can look at what we’re presenting, and that’s not too bad.”

I could have sat on my butt and complained when Hillary lost, but you see one thing about this country is if you get off your butt and apply yourself, you can be successful.

Cooper went on to ask Brown if the predominantly white male cabinet chosen by Trump was a concern to him.

A lot of black people in my community might think I’m a sellout for saying this. The three greatest people in my life were white…and so I’m not a person that really deals in color. I recognize certain equities that certain cultures have to go through, I understand the history of slavery, I know all of those things, but I’m not a victim. I can vote, I can participate, I can invest my money, I can invest my time and that’s what I’m doing. I’m not working for anybody or making any money making what I’m doing, I’m doing it because someone did it for me.

In a similar segment with CNN Brown was again asked if Trump’s cabinet choices were troubling to him.
He replied in similar fashion, shutting down the network’s attempt at race-baiting by stating, “I have lived all my life in America and I’m eighty years old, so I’ve seen discrimination at its worst… I never really had a father, but it was in this country where I got help from people who were not of my same color. When I come out of the box, I don’t come out racial, I look for good people who are like-minded and want to do good for other human beings.”

The Truth About Russia 'Hacking the Election'

What They're NOT Telling You About Fake News

Top US Spy Agency Refuses To Endorse CIA’s Russian Hacking Assessment Due To “Lack Of Evidence”

"ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent."

Zero Hedge - December 13, 2016

 

When the WaPo posted last Friday’s story about a “secret” CIA assessment that Russian cyber attacks were aimed at helping Republican President-elect Donald Trump win the 2016 election, the readers of the Bezos-owned publication took it as gospel, despite, as we promptly noted, there being no evidence provided by the CIA, and as we learned today, the FBI openly resisting the CIA’s assessment. It now appears that once again the WaPo may have been engaging in “partial fake news”, as it did with its Nov. 24 story about “Russian propaganda fake media.”

According to Reuters, the so-called overseers of the U.S. intelligence community as it supervises the 17 agency-strong U.S. intelligence community, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), while not disputing the CIA’s analysis of Russian hacking operations – something which would be unprecedented for the US spy industry and would telegraph just how partisan and broken the country’s intelligence apparatus has become – has refused to endorse the CIA’s assessment “because of a lack of conclusive evidence” that Moscow intended to boost Trump over Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton.

As Reuters conveniently notes, the ODNI position could give Trump fresh ammunition to dispute the CIA assessment, which he rejected as “ridiculous” in weekend remarks, and press his assertion that no evidence implicates Russia in the cyber attacks. The ODNI’s position confirms that Trump was once again, you guessed it, right.
“ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can’t prove intent,” said one of the three U.S. officials.

As reported earlier, the FBI, whose evidentiary standards require it to make cases that can stand up in court, likewise declined to accept the CIA’s analysis – a deductive assessment of the available intelligence – for the same reason, the three officials said.

The ODNI, headed by James Clapper, was established after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the recommendation of the commission that investigated the attacks. The commission, which identified major intelligence failures, recommended the office’s creation to improve coordination among U.S. intelligence agencies.

As a reminder, the first hint that the US would scapegoat Russia for an “unexpected election outcome” took place on October 7, when the U.S. government formally accused Russia of a campaign of cyber attacks against American political organizations ahead of the Nov. 8 presidential election. Back then, president Barack Obama has said he warned Russian President Vladimir Putin about consequences for the attacks. Reports of the assessment by the CIA, which has not publicly disclosed its findings, have prompted congressional leaders to call for an investigation.

The narrative escalated rapidly last week, when outgoing president Obama ordered intelligence agencies to review the cyber attacks and foreign intervention in the presidential election and to deliver a report before he turns power over to Trump on Jan. 20.

So how did the CIA come to its conclusion?

According to Reuters, the agency assessed after the election that the attacks on political organizations were aimed at swaying the vote for Trump because the targeting of Republican organizations diminished toward the end of the summer and focused on Democratic groups, a senior U.S. official told Reuters on Friday. Moreover, only materials filched from Democratic groups – such as emails stolen from John Podesta, the Clinton campaign chairman – were made public via WikiLeaks, the anti-secrecy organization, and other outlets, U.S. officials said.

The CIA conclusion – one of induction and no supporting evidence – was a “judgment based on the fact that Russian entities hacked both Democrats and Republicans and only the Democratic information was leaked,” one of the three officials said on Monday. “(It was) a thin reed upon which to base an analytical judgment,” the official added.

Earlier Monday, Senator John McCain said on Monday also confronted the CIA’s assessment, saying there was “no information” that Russian hacking of American political organizations was aimed at swaying the outcome of the election. “It’s obvious that the Russians hacked into our campaigns,” McCain said. “But there is no information that they were intending to affect the outcome of our election and that’s why we need a congressional investigation,” he told Reuters.

McCain also questioned an assertion made on Sunday by RNC Chair Reince Priebus, who said that there were no hacks of computers belonging to Republican organizations. “Actually, because Mr. Priebus said that doesn’t mean it’s true,” said McCain. “We need a thorough investigation of it, whether both (Democratic and Republican organizations) were hacked into, what the Russian intentions were. We cannot draw a conclusion yet. That’s why we need a thorough investigation.

”Well, just because HIllary said that, it did make it true, so perhaps Reince is right as well?

Meanwhile, in an angry letter sent to ODNI chief Clapper on Monday, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes said he was “dismayed” that the top U.S. intelligence official had not informed the panel of the CIA’s analysis and the difference between its judgment and the FBI’s assessment. Noting that Clapper in November testified that intelligence agencies lacked strong evidence linking Russian cyber attacks to the WikiLeaks disclosures, Nunes asked that Clapper, together with CIA and FBI counterparts, brief the panel by Friday on the latest intelligence assessment of Russian hacking during the election campaign.

We, for one, can’t wait to hear his testimony – under oath – why in the span of one month so much has changed, and who precisely prompted the CIA to “infer” that Russia is responsible for Hillary Clinton’s loss. Or maybe we will just have to wait for Wikileaks, pardon Russia, to hack Podesta’s email account for that first?

Fake News Attacks on Alex Jones and Trump are Failing

Desperate media attacks continue to fail as 1776 goes worldwide

Infowars.com - December 12, 2016

The establishment media, seemingly unaware of its plummeting popularity and waning influence, continues to attack Alex Jones and President-elect Donald Trump.
The comment section in a Washington Times hit piece last week, entitled, “Infowars’ Alex Jones appeals to Trump for aid over fears of ‘fake news’ crackdown,” perfectly exemplifies the public’s disdain for the dishonest press.
“The mainstream media’s clear intention with this ‘fake news’ campaign is to shut down infowars. It’s undeniable!,” one of the most popular comments said.
“No one listens to the Washington times,” another said. “The people know who really spreads the fake news: you. Pathetic.”





The so-called “mainstream media,” which itself is notorious for spreading fake news, is now attempting to shut down all opposing views in the wake up their devastating election failure.





Whether the lies of WMDs, which resulted in the death of hundreds of thousands, or “hands up don’t shoot,” the establishment press is the ultimate purveyor of fake news.


Click here to see the real list of fake news.

CIA Now Carrying Out Coup Against Trump

MAXIMUM ALERT: Rogue CIA Working to Overthrow Trump Election

CIA report claims Russia interfered in election to benefit Trump

Infowars.com - December 11, 2016

When the CIA – a group of admitted liars and domestic propagandists – come out with a report, you can bet it’s fake news.

Rogue CIA Calls For New Election Could Lead To Trump Assassination

CIA operative calls for second election

Alex Jones | Infowars.com - December 11, 2016

The same CIA responsible for overthrowing elected governments is completely trying to delegitimize Donald Trump’s presidency.

The Real Legacy of Barack Obama

Trump Bashes CIA, Dismisses Russian Hacking Report

"These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction," the Trump transition team said

USA Today - December 10, 2016

 

President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team questioned the credibility of the CIA late Friday in response to a report the agency found Russia intervened in the election to boost his prospects.
“These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction,” the Trump transition team said in a statement. “The election ended a long time ago in one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history. It’s now time to move on and ‘Make America Great Again.'”
The statement came in response to a report in The Washington Post that the CIA concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election on behalf of Trump.
“Intelligence agencies have identified individuals with connections to the Russian government who provided WikiLeaks with thousands of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and others, including Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, according to U.S. officials,” the Post reported, based on unnamed sources who were “briefed on the matter.”

Read more

Breaking! Congress Admits CIA Moving To Ban Free Speech In America

It is now alarmingly evident that there truly is a war on for your mind.

Alex Jones | Infowars.com - December 10, 2016

 

Alex Jones breaks down the total absurdity of the king and queen of fake news, Brian Williams and Hillary Clinton, declaring an all out attack on what they deem to be fake news.
Despite Williams losing his job with NBC’s Nightly News last year for spreading fake news and Clinton being caught lying about an attack on a Bosnia trip – not to mention voting for a war that killed thousands that was based on fake news – they continue to push forward in their attempt to shut down the alternative press that is rapidly growing and pushing out the faltering mainstream media.
As the EU demands censorship of fake news, Reddit, Facebook and others have begun blocking Infowars and other alternative media.
It is now alarmingly evident that there truly is a war on for your mind.

Washington Post Retracts: Admits Russians Not Running Alt-Right

This Video Proves The Media is Lying About Trump

Emergency Alert Government Announces Plan to Censor Alt Right Sites

Jill Stein's Recount Fraud Destroyed

INFOWARS The Alex Jones Show Sunday 4/12/2016

Trump Delivers Deathblow to Globalism

President-elect delivers powerful anti-globalist speech

Infowars.com - December 3, 2016

 

Alex Jones breaks down how President-elect Donald Trump is fulfilling his campaign promise to take on unelected global government and to finally put Americanism over globalism.
Watch highlights from Trump’s historic Victory Tour rally speech in Ohio this week:

Ted Nugent on President Donald Trump You have got to see this!

Watch Trump Make Obama Look Clueless

Trump May Be Banned From Twitter

Military Intelligence Wants to Talk to Me about My YouTube Channel

#PizzaGate Hillary Clinton GRAND OLD PEDOPHILE's Donald Trump No investigation